Article Title,Year,Volume,Issue,Page Range,Author
Epistemic justice and the struggle for critical suicide literacy,2020,34,6,555-565,Fitzpatrick
Knowledge is made for cutting - an introduction,2020,34,6,527-532,Jaworski
Morality mental illness and the prevention of suicide,2020,34,6,533-543,Kushner
The social production of psychocentric knowledge in suicidology,2020,34,6,544-554,Marsh
Subjective connectivity: rethinking loneliness isolation and belonging in discourses of minority youth suicide,2020,34,6,566-576,Cover
At the limits of suicide: the bad timing of the gift,2020,34,6,577-588,Jaworski
Towards ethics of wonder and generosity in critical suicidology,2020,34,6,589-600,Jaworski
Dealing with conspiracy theory attributions,2020,34,5,409-422,Martin
Should academics debunk conspiracy theories?,2020,34,5,423-439,Hagen
Believing to belong: addressing the novice-expert problem in polarized scientific communication,2020,34,5,440-452,Cruz
Untrol: post-truth and the new normal of post-normal science,2020,34,4,330-345,Farrell
Navigating between complexity and control in transdisciplinary problem framing: meaning making as an approach to reflexive integration,2020,34,4,357-369,Bornemann
Can novices trust themselves to choose trustworthy experts? Reasons for (reserved) optimism,2020,34,3,227-240,Brennan
How not to deal with the tragic dilemma,2020,34,3,253-264,Mugg
Max Weber's 'inconvenient facts' and contemporary studies of public science communication,2020,34,2,130-141,Shipovalova
Science and public good: Max Weber's ethical implications,2020,34,2,184-196,Kasavin
Re-thinking exposure to trauma and self-care in fieldwork-based social research (editorial),2020,34,1,1-11,Močnik
Dialogical research design: practising ethical useful and safe(r) research,2020,34,1,31-42,Poopuu
The epistemic benefits of worldview disagreement,2021,35,1,85-98,Lougheed
Echo chambers ignorance and domination,2021,35,2,109-119,Santos
Genocide denial as testimonial oppression,2021,35,2,133-146,Altanian
Denial of Japan's military sexual slavery and responsibility for epistemic amends,2021,35,2,160-172,Song
An epistemological conception of safe spaces,2021,35,3,285-311,Anderson
How and why we should argue with angry uncle: a defense of fact dumping and consistency checking,2021,35,5,533-545,Ferkany
An epistemic objection to racial profiling,2021,35,6,636-644,Lloyd
Fake news vs. echo chambers,2021,35,6,645-659,Fantl
In trust we trust: epistemic vigilance and responsibility,2022,36,3,283-298,Levy