TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2024//
TI  - Correction: Acute occupational exposures reported to the Dutch Poisons Information Center: a prospective study on the root causes of incidents at the workplace
JO  - Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology
A1  - Wijnands, Anja P. G.
A1  - de Vries, Irma
A1  - Verbruggen, Tim
A1  - Carlier, Maxim P.
A1  - de Lange, Dylan W.
A1  - Rietjens, Saskia J.
SP  - e5
EP  - e5
VL  - 19
IS  - 1
N2  - Correction: J Occup Med Toxicol 17, 19 (2022)    https://doi.org/10.1186/s12995-022-00360-4    In the original version of this article [1], inhalation was mentioned as the most common route of occupational exposure (62%), followed by ocular (40%) and dermal contact (33%). Due to a calculation error, the percentage for inhalation was incorrect. The correct percentage is 34%, i.e. in 34% of patients, occupational exposure occurred via inhalation.     Because of this error, the text of the abstract, results (exposure characteristics) and discussion, should be amended as follows:    Abstract: Patients were often exposed via multiple routes (ocular contact 40%, inhalation 34% and dermal contact 33%).     Results: Patients were often exposed via multiple routes, most commonly involving ocular contact (40.0%), followed by inhalation (33.9%), dermal contact (32.6%) and oral exposures (9.4%).     Discussion: Patients were often exposed via multiple routes (ocular contact 40%, inhalation 34% and dermal contact 33%). A comparable exposure pattern was found in a previous Poison Control Center (PCC) study [7].     The original article has been corrected.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1745-6673
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12995-024-00404-x
ID  - ref1
ER  -