TY - JOUR
PY - 2023//
TI - Media reporting on alcohol and other drugs in Australia and the Mindframe guidelines: baseline data
JO - Drug and alcohol review
A1 - Sunderland, Matthew
A1 - Kershaw, Stephanie
A1 - Ward, Caitlin
A1 - Bryant, Zachary
A1 - Teesson, Lily
A1 - Whittle, Rebecca
A1 - Paton, Elizabeth
A1 - Charnley, Janine L.
A1 - Skehan, Jaelea
SP - ePub
EP - ePub
VL - ePub
IS - ePub
N2 - INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to generate a baseline database of print media reporting on alcohol and other drug (AOD) issues prior to the release of the Mindframe guidelines in March 2019. Specifically, to: (i) describe the content associated with media entries that focus on AOD use in Australian news media; (ii) determine how the media entries compare to several domains associated with recently developed Mindframe guidelines for publicly reporting on AOD; and (iii) identify content factors associated with different scores.
METHODS: Media entries between July 2016 and June 2017 were searched for key AOD-related terms using the Australian and New Zealand Newsstream database. Two coding schemes were developed to rate a stratified sample of 50% of the media entries against the Mindframe guidelines. Associations between content and total comparison scores were determined using linear regression models.
RESULTS: Detailed coding of the 2007 articles identified as relevant for the current study indicated that a majority (67%) were focused on one of three substances: alcohol, cannabis or methamphetamine. Most of the entries were either law enforcement (22%) or criminal justice related (19%). Entries that focused on methamphetamine scored significantly lower than entries on alcohol when compared to the Mindframe guidelines, similarly entries focused on crime/justice-related topics scored significantly lower than entries focused on positive outcomes.
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: A disproportionate number of print media entries, particularly those related methamphetamine use, focused on crime or justice-related topics, potentially further contributing to stigma, and emphasising the legal consequences of AOD use.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0959-5236 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dar.13622 ID - ref1 ER -