TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2022//
TI  - Reliability and minimal detectable change of the Standardized Assessment of Reaction Time (StART)
JO  - Journal of athletic training
A1  - Lempke, Landon B.
A1  - Shumski, Eric J.
A1  - Prato, Thomas A.
A1  - Lynall, Robert C.
SP  - ePub
EP  - ePub
VL  - ePub
IS  - ePub
N2  - CONTEXT: Post-concussion reaction time deficits are common, but existing assessments lack sport-related applicability. We developed the Standardized Assessment of Reaction Time (StART) to emulate simultaneous cognitive and motor function demands in sport, but its reliability is unestablished. <br><br>OBJECTIVE: To determine the intra-rater, inter-rater, and test-retest reliability of StART, and examine the dual-task effect, time effect, and relationships between StART and computerized and laboratory-based functional reaction time assessments. <br><br>DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. SETTING: Clinical laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: 20 healthy, physically active participants (age: 20.3±1.8 years; 60% female; 75% no concussion history). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Participants completed StART, computerized reaction time (Stroop task via CNS Vital Signs), and laboratory-based jump landing and cutting reaction time under single-task and dual-task (subtracting by 6's or 7's) cognitive conditions at two testing sessions a median 7 days apart. We used Intraclass correlation coefficients, repeated-measure ANOVAs, and Pearson r correlations to address our aims. <br><br>RESULTS: Overall good to strong inter-rater (ICC2,k range:0.83-0.97), intra-rater (ICC3,k range:0.91-0.98), and test-retest reliability (ICC3,k range:0.69-0.89) were observed. A significant reaction time assessment by cognitive condition interaction was present (p=0.018,ηp2=0.14), with StART having the largest dual-task effect. Main time effects for dual-task conditions were observed across all reaction time assessments (mean difference: -25ms;p=0.026,ηp2=0.08) for improved performance at the second testing session. No StART outcomes correlated with computerized reaction time (p>0.05), although some StART outcomes correlated with single-task (r-range:0.42-65) and dual-task (r-range:0.19-0.50) laboratory cutting reaction time. <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: StART demonstrated overall reliable performance relative to other reaction time measures. Reliability coupled with a strong dual-task effect indicates StART is a valid measure for examining functional reaction time, and may have future utility for sport-related concussion return to play decision-making.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1062-6050
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0391.22
ID  - ref1
ER  -