TY - JOUR PY - 2021// TI - The continuing vitality of bias in research on guns and violence: a second "non-response response" to unfounded critiques JO - Justice quarterly A1 - Fridel, Emma E. SP - 955 EP - 960 VL - 38 IS - 5 N2 - ABTRACTFollowing Kleck's critique on my recent article on guns, firearms homicide, and mass shootings, I wrote a detailed and thorough reply refuting his methodological concerns and discussing directions for future research. In response, Kleck published a second rebuttal reiterating issues already addressed in both the original manuscript and the reply article, erroneously dismissing my work as a "non-response response" that is "destructive of the ends of scholarship." Here, I respond to Kleck's two critiques not discussed at length previously before highlighting the perils of confirmation bias and the politicization of science.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0741-8825 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07418825.2021.1930109 ID - ref1 ER -