TY - JOUR
PY - 2020//
TI - Can dual-task paradigms predict falls better than single task? - a systematic literature review
JO - Neurophysiologie Clinique
A1 - Bayot, Madli
A1 - Dujardin, Kathy
A1 - Dissaux, Lucile
A1 - Tard, Céline
A1 - Defebvre, Luc
A1 - Bonnet, Cédrick T.
A1 - Allart, Etienne
A1 - Allali, Gilles
A1 - Delval, Arnaud
SP - ePub
EP - ePub
VL - ePub
IS - ePub
N2 - With about one third of adults aged 65 years and older being reported worldwide to fall each year, and an even higher prevalence with advancing age, aged-related falls and the associated disabilities and mortality are a major public health concern. In this context, identification of fall risk in healthy older adults is a key component of fall prevention. Since dual-task outcomes rely on the interaction between cognition and motor control, some studies have demonstrated the role of dual-task walking performance or costs in predicting future fallers. However, based on previous reviews on the topic, (1) discriminative and (2) predictive powers of dual tasks involving gait and a concurrent task are still a matter of debate, as is (3) their superiority over single tasks in terms of fall-risk prediction. Moreover, less attention has been paid to dual tasks involving postural control and transfers (such as gait initiation and turns) as motor tasks. In the present paper, we therefore systematically reviewed recent literature over the last 7 years in order to answer the three above mentioned questions regarding the future of lab-based dual tasks (involving posture, gait initiation, gait and turning) as easily applicable tests for identifying healthy older adult fallers. Despite great heterogeneity among included studies, we emphasized, among other things, the promising added value of dual tasks including turns and other transfers, such as in the Timed Up and Go test, for prediction of falls. Further investigation of these is thus warranted. Language: en
LA - en
SN - 0987-7053
UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neucli.2020.10.008
ID - ref1
ER -