TY - JOUR PY - 2020// TI - What about drug checking? Systematic review and netnographic analysis of social media JO - Current neuropharmacology A1 - Guirguis, Amira A1 - Moosa, Isma A1 - Gittins, Rosalind A1 - Schifano, Fabrizio SP - ePub EP - ePub VL - ePub IS - ePub N2 - Drug checking services have been operating worldwide as a harm reduction tool in places like festivals and nightclubs. A systematic review and netnographic analysis were conducted to explore the public's perception of drug checking. Although public perceptions of drug checking had not been previously evaluated in the literature, some positive and negative perceptions were captured. From Twitter, a total of 1316 tweets were initially identified. Following the removal of irrelevant tweets, 235 relevant tweets were identified of which about 95% (n = 223) tweets were in favour and about 5% (n = 12) were not in favour of drug checking as a harm reduction intervention. Tweets perceived the service as part of effective law reforms, public health intervention that serves in raising awareness and countering the role of the internet, an initiative to prevent harm and/ or potentially premature deaths, a help in identifying novel trends related to drugs, enabling a scientific basis to capture data, reducing harms from risky drugs or risky consumption, reducing the economic and social burden on society and preventing young people from having criminal records and punitive fines. Drug checking was perceived to support engagement with treatment services and support individuals in making more informed decisions. Tweets against drug checking focussed on the concerns over the quality of drug checking particularly with false positive results, which may lead to punitive outcomes, discrimination and prejudice. The present study showed that Twitter can be a useful platform to capture people's perceptions on drug checking.

Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1570-159X UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1570159X18666200413142632 ID - ref1 ER -