TY - JOUR PY - 2001// TI - The real controversy about child sexual abuse research contradictory findings and critical issues not addressed by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman in their 1998 outcomes meta-analysis JO - Journal of child sexual abuse A1 - Tice, P. P. A1 - Lemmey, D. E. A1 - Baker, G. A1 - Whittenburg, J. A. SP - 157 EP - 182 VL - 9 IS - 3-4 N2 - This article presents a review of all types of child sexual abuse research ignored by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman in their 1998 meta-analytic study. Eight major findings are addressed. Altogether, these findings demonstrate the narrow focus of the Rind et al. meta-analysis. By restricting a supposedly broad meta-analysis to only some of the research and population in question, the conclusions Rind et al. drew regarding this complex topic (primarily, that adult-child sex is not necessarily harmful to children) are invalid.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1053-8712 UR - http://dx.doi.org/ ID - ref1 ER -