TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2018//
TI  - Self-representation: pro se cross-examination and revisiting trauma upon child witnesses
JO  - International journal on child maltreatment : research, policy and practice
A1  - Hobbs, Sue D.
A1  - Goodman, Gail S.
SP  - 77
EP  - 95
VL  - 1
IS  - 1
N2  - In the United States, the right to confront one's accusers at trial is one of the key components of the adversarial legal process. As a part of this process, defendants are permitted to represent themselves if they decide to do so voluntarily (Faretta v. California 1975). As cross-examination of witnesses is considered essential to the adversarial legal system, child victims can be faced with being personally cross-examined by defendants. In cases involving vulnerable witnesses, such as child abuse victims, there is concern that being cross-examined by the defendant can be highly problematic and create more trauma over and above being cross-examined by a defense attorney. In the United States, there are no laws that explicitly forbid defendants from cross-examining their own victims, and decisions are made on a case-by-case basis. We discuss relevant legal traditions in the United States, laws and procedures followed by other countries that use the adversarial system, current psychological research on cross-examination of child witnesses, the need for further research, and recommendations for ways the United States can protect the rights, well-being, and personal security of vulnerable children.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 2524-5236
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s42448-018-0005-z
ID  - ref1
ER  -