TY - JOUR
PY - 2018//
TI - Distinguishing people with current, past, and no history of non-suicidal self-injury: shame, social comparison, and self-concept integration
JO - Journal of affective disorders
A1 - Taylor, Peter J.
A1 - McDonald, James
A1 - Smith, Megan
A1 - Nicholson, Hannah
A1 - Forrester, Rebecca
SP - 182
EP - 188
VL - 246
IS -
N2 - OBJECTIVE: Non-Suicidal Self-Injury (NSSI) can have a major impact on the lives of individuals and those around them. The way in which a person feels about and perceives themselves (i.e. self-concept) appears central to understanding NSSI. The current study investigates three variables linked to self-concept: shame, social comparison, and self-concept integration. We examine how well these variables differentiate people who report past NSSI, people who report current NSSI, and people who have never engaged in NSSI.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional.
METHOD: Individuals reporting NSSI in the past year (n = 51), individuals with a history of NSSI but none in the past year (n = 44), and individuals with no history of NSSI (n = 110) were compared on measures of shame, social comparison, and self-concept integration.
RESULTS: Shame was elevated in people with a history of NSSI but did not distinguish between past and current NSSI when other variables were controlled for. Self-concept integration was poorer in people reporting current NSSI than people reporting past NSSI, even when controlling for other variables.
CONCLUSIONS: The results support the role of shame as a general marker for NSSI risk, but suggest self-concept integration may fluctuate more dynamically in relation to the recency of NSSI. The study is limited by a non-matched student control group.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0165-0327 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.033 ID - ref1 ER -