TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2018//
TI  - Incidence, course and risk factors of head injury: a retrospective cohort study
JO  - BMJ open
A1  - Gerritsen, Herman
A1  - Samim, Mariam
A1  - Peters, Hans
A1  - Schers, Henk
A1  - Laar, Floris van de
SP  - e020364
EP  - e020364
VL  - 8
IS  - 5
N2  - OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of head injury and predictors of complication across the care continuum. <br><br>DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study using data from a research network. We calculated the incidence of overall head injury in a longitudinal cohort covering 1-year interval (31 369 patient-years), and the incidence of complicated head injury in a longitudinal cohort covering 10 years interval (220 352 patient-ears). Incidence rates were calculated per 1000 patient-years with 95% CI using the Mid-P exact test. We calculated ORs to assess potential risk factors for a complicated head injury. SETTING: A practice-based research network covering a population of >30 000 patients. PARTICIPANTS: All patients listed in practices within the research network during the years 2005-2014. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of (complicated) head injury and predictors for clinical complications. <br><br>RESULTS: The incidence of overall head injury was 22.1 per 1000 person-years and the incidence of a complicated course following head injury was 0.16 per 1000 person-years. The following determinants were risk factors for a complicated course: high energy trauma, bicycle accident, traffic accident in general, use of anticoagulants, alcohol intoxication, age above 60 years and low Glasgow Coma Scale at initial presentation. A complicated course was very unlikely when the patients' first encounter with a healthcare professional was in primary care (OR 0.03, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.07). <br><br>CONCLUSIONS: Complication after head injury are rarely seen in general practice. Patients who do experience complications are often easily identifiable as requiring specialist care. A more reserved referral policy for general practice may be desirable, suggesting that current guidelines are too defensive.<br><br>© Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 2044-6055
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020364
ID  - ref1
ER  -