TY  - JOUR
PY  - 1965//
TI  - Sexual appetite and sexual drive
JO  - Psychological reports
A1  - Margoshes, Adam
A1  - Litt, Sheldon
SP  - 713
EP  - 719
VL  - 16
IS  - 3
N2  - Hardy's appetitional theory of sexuality is examined critically and compared with Freud's libidinal drive theory. It is maintained that sexuality is both a drive and an appetite and that Freud's theory is more complete than Hardy's because it deals with both of these aspects. Specific comparisons are drawn in relation to the periodicity of women's desire, the pleasure of genital stimulation, and the "unpleasure" in arousal short of orgasm. Finally, it is argued that Hardy has inappropriately intruded moral considerations into scientific theory.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0033-2941
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1965.16.3.713
ID  - ref1
ER  -