TY  - JOUR
PY  - 2018//
TI  - Conducting joint interviews with couples: ethical and methodological challenges
JO  - Qualitative health research
A1  - Zarhin, Dana
SP  - 844
EP  - 854
VL  - 28
IS  - 5
N2  - Scholars have recently begun to discuss joint interviewing from a methodological perspective, generally presenting a favorable view of this mode of interviewing. In the present article, the author draws on her experiences with interviewing obstructive sleep apnea patients and their partners to shed further light on the methodological and ethical challenges of joint interviews. Specifically, it is shown that joint interviews may become a site in which one partner silences the other and enacts symbolic violence, with the interviewer as unwilling abettor, or alternatively may facilitate passivity. Joint interviewing may therefore prevent researchers from giving an equal voice to both partners, resulting in partial and fragmented data. In addition, the joint approach may generate tension between members of the couple and harm the quality of relationships, thus contravening the researcher's commitment to non-maleficence. The author points to a few possible solutions and suggests interviewing social partners as an alternative to couples.<p />  <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 1049-7323
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049732317749196
ID  - ref1
ER  -