TY - JOUR PY - 2016// TI - The "Strengthen your ankle" program to prevent recurrent injuries: a randomized controlled trial aimed at long-term effectiveness JO - Journal of science and medicine in sport A1 - Van Reijen, M. A1 - Vriend, I. A1 - Zuidema, V. A1 - van Mechelen, W. A1 - Verhagen, E. A. SP - 549 EP - 554 VL - 20 IS - 6 N2 - OBJECTIVES: Recurrent ankle sprains can be reduced by a neuromuscular training program (NMT). The way NMT is delivered may influence the incidence of long term recurrent injuries, residual pain and disability.

DESIGN: This RCT with a follow-up of twelve months, evaluated whether the implementation method of a proven effective NMT program delivered by a mobile application or a written instruction booklet, resulted in differences in injury incidence rates, functional ankle disability/pain in the long term, assuming equal compliance - as is shown in previous research - with the 8-week intervention.

METHODS: 220 athletes with a history of ankle sprain were recruited for this RCT. 110 athletes were offered the freely available "Strengthen your ankle App" and the other 110 received a printed Booklet. Primary outcome measure was incidence density of ankle sprains. Secondary outcome measures were residual pain/disability and the individual cumulative number of ankle sprains during follow-up.

RESULTS: The incidence densities of self-reported ankle sprain recurrences were not significantly different between both groups (HR 1.06; 95% CI 0.76-1.49). Median FADI (Functional Ankle and Disability Index) scores increased equally over time in both groups, indicating a lower rate of limitation and pain in both groups at follow-up. Neither FADI scores nor cumulative recurrent injuries were significantly different between groups.

CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the implementation method of a NMT program by using an App or a Booklet did neither lead to different injury incidence rates in the long term nor did it influence residual functional disability/pain. Assuming equal compliance during the 8-week intervention, both methods show similar effectiveness in twelve-month follow-up.

Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1440-2440 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsams.2016.12.001 ID - ref1 ER -