TY - JOUR
PY - 2016//
TI - Impact of a state law on physician practice in sports-related concussions
JO - Journal of pediatrics
A1 - Flaherty, Michael R.
A1 - Raybould, Toby
A1 - Jamal-Allial, Aziza
A1 - Kaafarani, Haytham M. A.
A1 - Lee, Jarone
A1 - Gervasini, Alice
A1 - Ginsburg, Richard
A1 - Mandell, Mark
A1 - Donelan, Karen
A1 - Masiakos, Peter T.
SP - 268
EP - 274
VL - 178
IS -
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To determine physician-reported adherence to and support of the 2010 Massachusetts youth concussion law, as well as barriers to care and clinical practice in the context of legislation. STUDY DESIGN: Primary care physicians (n = 272) in a large pediatric network were eligible for a cross-sectional survey in 2014. Survey questions addressed key policy and practice provisions: concussion knowledge, state regulations and training, practice patterns, referrals, patient characteristics, and barriers to care. Analyses explored relationships between practice and policy, adjusting for physician demographic and practice characteristics.
RESULTS: The survey response rate was 64% among all responders (173 of 272). A total of 146 respondents who had evaluated, treated, or referred patients with a suspected sports-related concussion in the previous year were eligible for analysis. The vast majority (90%) of providers agreed that the current Massachusetts laws regarding sports concussions are necessary and support the major provisions. Three-quarters (74%) had taken a required clinician training course on concussions. Those who took training courses were significantly more likely to develop individualized treatment plans (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 1.1-11.0). Physician training did not improve screening of youth with concussion for depression or substance use. Most physicians (77%) advised patients to refrain from computer, telephone, or television for various time periods. Physicians reported limited communication with schools.
CONCLUSIONS: Primary care physicians report being comfortable with the diagnosis and management of concussions, and support statewide regulations; however, adherence to mandated training and specific legal requirements varied. Broader and more frequent training may be necessary to align current best evidence with clinical care and state-mandated practice.
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Language: en
LA - en SN - 0022-3476 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.08.025 ID - ref1 ER -