TY - JOUR PY - 2015// TI - Concussion-related protocols and preparticipation assessments used for incoming student-athletes in National Collegiate Athletic Association member institutions JO - Journal of athletic training A1 - Kerr, Zachary Y. A1 - Snook, Erin M. A1 - Lynall, Robert A1 - Dompier, Thomas P. A1 - Sales, Latrice A1 - Parsons, John T. A1 - Hainline, Brian SP - 1174 EP - 1181 VL - 50 IS - 11 N2 - CONTEXT:  National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) legislation requires that member institutions have policies to guide the recognition and management of sport-related concussions. Identifying the nature of these policies and the mechanisms of their implementation can help identify areas of needed improvement.

OBJECTIVE:  To estimate the characteristics and prevalence of concussion-related protocols and preparticipation assessments used for incoming NCAA student-athletes.

DESIGN:  Cross-sectional study. SETTING:  Web-based survey. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS:  Head athletic trainers from all 1113 NCAA member institutions were contacted; 327 (29.4%) completed the survey. INTERVENTION(S):  Participants received an e-mail link to the Web-based survey. Weekly reminders were sent during the 4-week window. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S):  Respondents described concussion-related protocols and preparticipation assessments (eg, concussion history, neurocognitive testing, balance testing, symptom checklists). Descriptive statistics were compared by division and football program status.

RESULTS:  Most universities provided concussion education to student-athletes (95.4%), had return-to-play policies (96.6%), and obtained the number of previous concussions sustained by incoming student-athletes (97.9%). Fewer had return-to-learn policies (66.6%). Other concussion history-related information (eg, symptoms, hospitalization) was more often collected by Division I universities. Common preparticipation neurocognitive and balance tests were the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT; 77.1%) and Balance Error Scoring System (46.5%). In total, 43.7% complied with recommendations for preparticipation assessments that included concussion history, neurocognitive testing, balance testing, and symptom checklists. This was due to moderate use of balance testing (56.6%); larger proportions used concussion history (99.7%, n = 326), neurocognitive testing (83.2%), and symptom checklists (91.7%). More Division I universities (55.2%) complied with baseline assessment recommendations than Division II (38.2%, χ(2) = 5.49, P =.02) and Division III (36.1%, χ(2) = 9.11, P =.002) universities.

CONCLUSIONS:  National Collegiate Athletic Association member institutions implement numerous strategies to monitor student-athletes. Division II and III universities may need additional assistance to collect in-depth concussion histories and conduct balance testing. Universities should continue developing or adapting (or both) return-to-learn policies. Keywords: American football;

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1062-6050 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-50.11.11 ID - ref1 ER -