TY - JOUR PY - 2015// TI - Clinical utility of the trail-making tests as a predictor of driving performance in older adults JO - Journal of the American Geriatrics Society A1 - Papandonatos, George D. A1 - Ott, Brian R. A1 - Davis, Jennifer D. A1 - Barco, Peggy P. A1 - Carr, David B. SP - 2358 EP - 2364 VL - 63 IS - 11 N2 - OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical utility of the Trail-Making Tests (TMTs) as screens for impaired road-test performance.

DESIGN: Secondary analyses of three data sets from previously published studies of impaired driving in older adults using comparable road test designs and outcome measures. SETTING: Two academic driving specialty clinics. PARTICIPANTS: Older drivers (N = 392; 303 with cognitive impairment, 89 controls) from Rhode Island and Missouri. MEASUREMENTS: Standard operating characteristics were evaluated for the TMT Part A (TMT-A) and Part B (TMT-B), as well as optimal upper and lower test cut-points that could be useful in defining groups of drivers with indeterminate likelihood of impaired driving who would most benefit from further screening or on-road testing.

RESULTS: Discrimination remained high (>70%) when cut-points for the TMTs derived from Rhode Island data were applied to Missouri data, but calibration was poor (all P <.01). TMT-A provided the best utility for determining a range of scores (68-90 seconds) for which additional road testing would be indicated in general practice settings. A high frequency of cognitively impaired participants unable to perform the TMT-B test within the allotted time limited the utility of the test (>25%). Mere inability to complete the test in a reasonable time frame (e.g., TMT-A > 48 seconds or TMT-B > 108 seconds) may still be a useful tool in separating unsafe from safe or marginal drivers in such samples.

CONCLUSION: The TMTs (particularly TMT-A) may be useful as screens for driving impairment in older drivers in general practice settings, where most people are still safe drivers, but more-precise screening measures need to be analyzed critically in a variety of clinical settings for testing cognitively impaired older drivers.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0002-8614 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13776 ID - ref1 ER -