TY - JOUR PY - 2012// TI - Psychological distress and risk of long-term disability: population-based longitudinal study JO - Journal of epidemiology and community health A1 - Rai, Dheeraj A1 - Kosidou, Kyriaki A1 - Lundberg, Michael A1 - Araya, Ricardo A1 - Lewis, Glyn A1 - Magnusson, Cecilia SP - 586 EP - 592 VL - 66 IS - 7 N2 - Background Common mental disorders are known to cause long-term disability, although not much is known about long-term consequences of milder forms of psychological distress.

OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between increasing levels of psychological distress and 5-year risk of long-term disability pensions awarded for somatic or psychiatric conditions.

METHODS In this longitudinal population-based study, a cohort of 17 205 individuals, aged 18-64 years, recruited in 2002 in Stockholm County was prospectively followed up for new disability pension awards. The 12-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) was used to measure baseline psychological distress, and participants were categorised as having no, mild, moderate or severe psychological distress (GHQ-12 scores of 0; 1-2; 3-7 and 8-12, respectively). Details of new disability pension awards were obtained through record linkage with the Swedish National Insurance register. Comprehensive information on a range of sociodemographic, lifestyle and health characteristics was available.

RESULTS Increasing levels of psychological distress at baseline were associated with an increased likelihood of obtaining a disability pension later in life. Even mild psychological distress was independently associated with the award of a disability pension for both somatic (HR=1.7; 95% CI 1.3 to 2.2) and psychiatric diagnoses (2.2; 1.4 to 3.6). Over a quarter of disability pensions awarded for a somatic diagnosis, and almost two-thirds awarded for a psychiatric diagnosis, could be attributed to psychological distress.

CONCLUSIONS Mild psychological distress may be associated with more long-term disability than previously acknowledged and its public health importance may be underestimated.

LA - en SN - 0143-005X UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jech.2010.119644 ID - ref1 ER -