TY - JOUR PY - 2014// TI - The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness JO - Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance A1 - Geniole, Shawn N. A1 - Molnar, Danielle S. A1 - Carré, Justin M. A1 - McCormick, Cheryl M. SP - 1526 EP - 1541 VL - 40 IS - 4 N2 - Variation in the facial width-to-height ratio (face ratio) is associated with judgments of aggression and of trustworthiness made by observers when viewing men's faces. Although judgments of aggression and of trustworthiness are correlated, they represent distinct constructs. We thus investigated the hypothesis that judgments of aggression share stronger associations with the face ratio than judgments of trustworthiness, and that judgments of aggression mediate the link between the face ratio and trustworthiness. Across 4 separate studies, involving 129 observers rating subsets of 141 photographs (original photographs of individuals who provided consent for their use) of clean-shaven (65 faces), unshaved (22 faces), or digitized male faces (54 faces; digitized faces were creating using facial modeling software), this hypothesis was supported. The correlations between the face ratio and judgments of aggression were moderate to strong in all 4 studies (rs =.45 to.70). Reaction time was measured in Study 4: Participants judged aggression faster than trustworthiness; thus, temporal precedence also supports the hypothesis that aggression mediates the link between the face ratio and trustworthiness. Sensitivity to the face ratio may therefore be part of a perceptual mechanism specialized to assess aggressiveness rather than trustworthiness in others, likely because of the greater necessity for rapid judgments of aggressive potential than trustworthiness. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2014 APA, all rights reserved).

Language: en

LA - en SN - 0096-1523 UR - http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0036732 ID - ref1 ER -