TY - JOUR PY - 2003// TI - A practical method for the evaluation of symptom exaggeration in minor head trauma among civil litigants JO - The journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law A1 - Sreenivasan, Shoba A1 - Eth, Spencer A1 - Kirkish, Patricia A1 - Garrick, Thomas SP - 220 EP - 231 VL - 31 IS - 2 N2 - Forensic psychiatrists and psychologists are often called on to provide opinions and render testimony in which minor head trauma accompanied by persistent somatic, cognitive, and/or emotional symptoms is alleged. The frequency of persistent symptoms following such minor head injury is generally low. The forensic clinician therefore must differentiate between subtle brain dysfunction, symptom amplification, psychogenic-based causes for the presence of cognitive and other deficits, or frank malingering. The purpose of this article is twofold: first, to review critical issues related to the assessment of malingering and symptom exaggeration in mild head injury cases; and second, to offer a practical model for the assessment of amplified neuropsychological and psychiatric deficits in civil litigants in cases of minor head trauma.

Language: en

LA - en SN - 1093-6793 UR - http://dx.doi.org/ ID - ref1 ER -