TY  - JOUR
PY  - 1999//
TI  - Domestic abuse in pregnancy: A comparison of a self-completed domestic abuse questionnaire with a directed interview
JO  - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
A1  - Canterino, J. C.
A1  - VanHorn, L. G.
A1  - Harrigan, J. T.
A1  - Ananth, C. V.
A1  - Vintzileos, A. M.
SP  - 1049
EP  - 1051
VL  - 181
IS  - 5 Pt 1
N2  - OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the results of a standardized self-completed domestic abuse questionnaire with those of a directed interview in the identification of domestic abuse in pregnant patients. STUDY DESIGN: All patients with a first prenatal visit between March 1 and September 30, 1997, were assessed for self-reported domestic abuse with a standardized domestic abuse questionnaire. This was followed by a directed interview that involved verbal review of the standardized domestic abuse questionnaire. Self-reported domestic abuse was defined as any positive response to the domestic abuse questionnaire or the directed interview. The number of patients with a positive response to either the standardized questionnaire or the directed interview, or both, were recorded. The 2 techniques were compared by the McNemar chi(2) test. The group demographics and characteristics were evaluated. RESULTS: Among the 224 patients evaluated, a total of 36% (n = 80) of the patients reported domestic abuse by either method. The standardized domestic abuse questionnaire identified 85% (n = 68) compared with 59% (n = 47) by a directed interview (P =.03). The use of the standardized domestic abuse questionnaire and the directed interview in parallel identified an additional 15% (n = 12) of patients with domestic abuse. CONCLUSION: A standardized domestic abuse questionnaire is superior to a directed interview in identifying self-reported domestic abuse in pregnancy. Utilizing both methods in parallel further increases the number of patients identified.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>
LA  - en
SN  - 0002-9378
UR  - http://dx.doi.org/
ID  - ref1
ER  -