%0 Journal Article
%T Barriers to screening for domestic violence
%J Journal of general internal medicine
%D 2002
%A Elliott, Lorrie
%A Nerney, Michael
%A Jones, Theresa
%A Friedmann, Peter D.
%V 17
%N 2
%P 112-116
%X CONTEXT: Domestic violence has an estimated 30% lifetime prevalence among women, yet physicians detect as few as 1 in 20 victims of abuse. OBJECTIVE: To identify factors associated with physicians' low screening rates for domestic violence and perceived barriers to screening. DESIGN: Cross-sectional postal survey. PARTICIPANTS: A national systematic sample of 2,400 physicians in 4 specialties likely to initially encounter abused women. The overall response rate was 53%. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported percentage of female patients screened for domestic violence; logistic models identified factors associated with screening less than 10%. RESULTS: Respondent physicians screened a median of only 10% (interquartile range, 2 to 25) of female patients. Ten percent reported they never screen for domestic violence; only 6% screen all their patients. Higher screening rates were associated with obstetrics-gynecology specialty (odds ratio [OR], 0.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.78), female gender (OR, 0.51; CI, 0.35 to 0.73), estimated prevalence of domestic violence in the physician's practice (per 10%, OR, 0.72; CI, 0.65 to 0.80), domestic violence training in the last 12 months (OR, 0.46; CI, 0.29 to 0.74) or previously (OR, 0.54; CI, 0.34 to 0.85), and confidence in one's ability to recognize victims (per Likert-scale point, OR, 0.71; CI, 0.58 to 0.87). Lower screening rates were associated with emergency medicine specialty (OR, 1.72; CI, 1.13 to 2.63), agreement that patients would volunteer a history of abuse (per Likert-scale point, OR, 1.60; CI, 1.25 to 2.05), and forgetting to ask about domestic violence (OR, 1.69; CI, 1.42 to 2.02). CONCLUSIONS: Physicians screen few female patients for domestic violence. Further study should address whether domestic violence training can correct misperceptions and improve physician self-confidence in caring for victims and whether the use of specific intervention strategies can enhance screening rates.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>
%G en
%I Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group
%@ 0884-8734
%U http://dx.doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10233.x