@article{ref1,
title="Hazardous drinking interventions delivered during medical-surgical care: patient and provider views",
journal="Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings",
year="2023",
author="Timko, Christine and Lewis, Mandy and Lor, Mai Chee and Aldaco-Revilla, Laura and Blonigen, Daniel and Ilgen, Mark",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Addressing hazardous drinking during medical-surgical care improves patients' health. This formative evaluation examined patients' consideration of options to change drinking and engage in treatment. It explored whether interventions such as &quot;DO-MoST&quot; overcome treatment barriers. We interviewed 20 medical-surgical patients with hazardous drinking in a trial of DO-MoST, and 16 providers. Analyses used a directed content approach. Patients were receptive to and comfortable discussing drinking during medical-surgical care. Interventions like DO-MoST (patient-centered, motivational approach to shared decision making) addressed some treatment barriers. Patients and providers viewed such interventions as helpful by building a relationship with a psychologist who facilitated self-awareness of drinking behaviors, and discussing connections between alcohol- and physical health-related problems and potential strategies to address drinking. However, both groups expressed concerns about individual and system-level barriers to long-term change. Interventions like DO-MoST bridge the gap between the patient's medical treatment episode and transition to other health care settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT03258632).<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1068-9583",
doi="10.1007/s10880-023-09954-4",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10880-023-09954-4"
}