@article{ref1,
title="Domestic and family violence behaviour change programs: an examination of gendered and non-gendered frameworks",
journal="Journal of community safety and well-being",
year="2022",
author="Boxhall, Emily and Birch, Philip",
volume="7",
number="2",
pages="75-80",
abstract="This article sets out to examine the dichotomous frameworks used to inform domestic and family violence (DFV) behaviour change programs (BCPs). Based on a Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) methodology, we consider what works and what does not work in the delivery of Domestic and Family Violence programs through a gendered and non-gendered framework. This methodology was selected as it supports a balanced assessment of existing published research in the area, allowing for the current knowledge base to be critically examined. As a result, the REA revealed both the strengths and weaknesses of traditional gendered approaches focusing on the Duluth Model and non-gendered therapeutic approaches focusing on Cognitive Behaviour Therapy (CBT). Yet, while strengths and weaknesses can be seen in both the &quot;violence as gendered&quot; and &quot;violence as non-gendered&quot; paradigms, a case is made for only delivering BCPs within a non-gendered framework.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2371-4298",
doi="10.35502/jcswb.240",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.35502/jcswb.240"
}