@article{ref1,
title="Feasibility and utility of a flexible outcome assessment battery for longitudinal traumatic brain injury research: a TRACK-TBI study",
journal="Journal of neurotrauma",
year="2022",
author="Bodien, Yelena G. and Barber, Jason and Taylor, Sabrina R. and Boase, Kim Dawn and Corrigan, John D. and Dikmen, Sureyya and Gardner, Raquel C. and Kramer, Joel and Levin, Harvey and Machamer, Joan and McAllister, Thomas and Nelson, Lindsay D. and Ngwenya, Laura Benjamin and Sherer, Mark and Stein, Murray B. and Vassar, Mary J. and Whyte, John and Yue, John K. and Markowitz, Amy J. and McCrea, Michael and Manley, Geoffrey T. and Temkin, Nancy and Giacino, Joseph",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="The effects of traumatic brain injury (TBI) are difficult to measure in longitudinal cohort studies, as disparate preinjury characteristics and injury mechanisms produce variable impairment profiles and recovery trajectories. In preparation for the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in TBI (TRACK-TBI) study, which followed patients with injuries ranging from uncomplicated mild TBI to coma, we designed a multidimensional Flexible outcome Assessment Battery (FAB). The FAB relies on a decision-making algorithm that assigns participants to a Comprehensive [CAB] or Abbreviated Assessment Battery [AAB] and guides test selection across all phases of recovery. To assess feasibility of the FAB, we calculated the proportion of participants followed at 2 weeks (2w) and at 3, 6 and 12 months (3m, 6m, 12m) post-injury who completed the FAB and received valid scores. We evaluated utility of the FAB by examining differences in 6m and 12m Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOSE) scores between participant subgroups derived from the FAB-enabled versus traditional approach to outcome assessment applied at 2w. Among participants followed at 2w (N= 2,094), 3m (N=1,871), 6m (N=1,736), and 12m (N=1,607) post-injury, 95-99% received valid completion scores on the FAB, in full or in part, either in-person or by telephone. Level of function assessed by the FAB-enabled approach at 2w was associated with 6m and 12m GOSE scores (proportional odds p<0.001). These findings suggest that the participant classification methodology afforded by the FAB may enable more effective data collection to improve detection of natural history changes and TBI treatment effects.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0897-7151",
doi="10.1089/neu.2022.0141",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/neu.2022.0141"
}