@article{ref1,
title="Does honesty require time? Two preregistered direct replications of experiment 2 of Shalvi, Eldar, and Bereby-Meyer (2012)",
journal="Psychological science",
year="2020",
author="Van der Cruyssen, Ine and D'hondt, Jonathan and Meijer, Ewout and Verschuere, Bruno",
volume="ePub",
number="ePub",
pages="ePub-ePub",
abstract="Shalvi, Eldar, and Bereby-Meyer (2012) found across two studies (<i>N</i> = 72 for each) that time pressure increased cheating. These findings suggest that dishonesty comes naturally, whereas honesty requires overcoming the initial tendency to cheat. Although the study's results were statistically significant, a Bayesian reanalysis indicates that they had low evidential strength. In a direct replication attempt of Shalvi et al.'s Experiment 2, we found that time pressure did not increase cheating, <i>N</i> = 428, point biserial correlation (<i>r<sub>pb</sub></i>) =.05, Bayes factor (BF)<sub>01</sub> = 16.06. One important deviation from the original procedure, however, was the use of mass testing. In a second direct replication with small groups of participants, we found that time pressure also did not increase cheating, <i>N</i> = 297, <i>r<sub>pb</sub></i> =.03, BF<sub>01</sub> = 9.59. These findings indicate that the original study may have overestimated the true effect of time pressure on cheating and the generality of the effect beyond the original context.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0956-7976",
doi="10.1177/0956797620903716",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797620903716"
}