@article{ref1,
title="The psychometric properties of the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality rating scale",
journal="Journal of clinical psychology (Hoboken)",
year="2019",
author="Corona, Christopher D. and Gutierrez, Peter M. and Wagner, Barry M. and Jobes, David A.",
volume="75",
number="1",
pages="190-201",
abstract="OBJECTIVE: The CAMS Rating Scale (CRS) is an adherence measure for the Collaborative Assessment and Management of Suicidality (CAMS), a suicide-specific clinical intervention. This study examined the ability of the CRS to assess adherence to CAMS. <br><br>METHODS: Video-recorded therapy sessions of clinicians delivering either CAMS or Enhanced Care-As-Usual (E-CAU) were rated with the CRS. These ratings (N = 98) were used to evaluate criterion validity, internal consistency, and factor structure. <br><br>RESULTS: Criterion validity and factor analyses did not support the organization of the CRS into its current subscales. Furthermore, the identified factor model and item-level statistics revealed weak CRS items. Finally, internal consistency was higher among CAMS clinicians than among clinicians delivering E-CAU. <br><br>CONCLUSION: These results establish the CRS as a measure that can effectively assess the adherence to CAMS in its current form. Potential revisions to future iterations of the CRS are discussed.<br><br>© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0021-9762",
doi="10.1002/jclp.22699",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22699"
}