@article{ref1,
title="Review of assessment scales for diagnosing and monitoring sports-related concussion",
journal="Curēus",
year="2017",
author="Dessy, Alexa M. and Yuk, Frank J. and Maniya, Akbar Y. and Gometz, Alex and Rasouli, Jonathan J. and Lovell, Mark R. and Choudhri, Tanvir F.",
volume="9",
number="12",
pages="e1922-e1922",
abstract="Sports-related concussion has emerged as a public health crisis due to increased diagnosis of the condition and increased participation in organized and recreational athletics worldwide. Under-recognition of concussions can lead to premature clearance for athletic participation, leaving athletes vulnerable to repeat injury and subsequent short- and long-term complications. There is overwhelming evidence that assessment and management of sports-related concussions should involve a multifaceted approach. A number of assessment criteria have been developed for this purpose. It is important to understand the available and emerging diagnostic testing modalities for sports-related concussions. The most commonly used tools for evaluating individuals with concussion are the Post-Concussion Symptom Scale (PCSS), Standard Assessment of Concussion (SAC), Standard Concussion Assessment Tool (SCAT3), and the most recognized computerized neurocognitive test, the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT). The strengths and limitations of each of these tools, and the Concussion Resolution Index (CRI), CogSport, and King-Devick tests were evaluated. Based on the data, it appears that the most sensitive and specific of these is the ImPACT test. Additionally, the King-Devick test is an effective adjunct due to its ability to test eye movements and brainstem function.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="2168-8184",
doi="10.7759/cureus.1922",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.7759/cureus.1922"
}