@article{ref1,
title="Attribution of crime motives biases eyewitnesses' memory and sentencing decisions",
journal="Psychology, crime and law",
year="2016",
author="Hellmann, Deborah F. and Memon, Amina",
volume="22",
number="10",
pages="957-976",
abstract="In court, the basic expectation is that eyewitness accounts are solely based on what the witness saw. Research on post-event influences has shown that this is not always the case and memory distortions are quite common. However, potential effects of an eyewitness' attributions regarding a perpetrator's crime motives have been widely neglected in this domain. In this paper, we present two experiments (N = 209) in which eyewitnesses were led to conclude that a perpetrator's motives for a crime were either dispositional or situational. As expected, misinformation consistent with an eyewitness' attribution of crime motives was typically falsely recognised as true whereas inconsistent misinformation was correctly rejected. Furthermore, a dispositional vs. situational attribution of crime motives resulted in more severe (mock) sentencing supporting previous research. The findings are discussed in the context of schema-consistent biases and the effect of attributions about character in a legal setting.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1068-316X",
doi="10.1080/1068316X.2016.1207768",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2016.1207768"
}