@article{ref1,
title="A hybrid decision framework for evaluating psychometric evidence",
journal="Behavioral sciences and the law",
year="1995",
author="Marlowe, Douglas B.",
volume="13",
number="2",
pages="207-228",
abstract="The United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. Merrell Dour Pharmaceuticals (1993) directed federal trial judges to preliminarily evaluate the scientific bases of proffered expert evidence. This article presents a decision flowchart for evaluating psychometric data, and attempts to operationalize existing evidentiary standards in hybrid (part science/part law) terms. The resulting framework should better assist courts and forensic experts to understand, evaluate, and apply scientific reasoning in determining the admissibility and probative value of psychometric evidence.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0735-3936",
doi="10.1002/bsl.2370130205",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2370130205"
}