@article{ref1,
title="A realist theory of terminology: the sociocognitive",
journal="Terminologies nouvelles",
year="2000",
author="Temmerman, Rita",
volume="21",
number="",
pages="58-64",
abstract="Under the strong influence of the Vienna School (Wüster 1993 Felber 1984) the discipline of terminology has been reduced to a set of principles of normalization. The study of the terminology of life sciences (microbiology, genetic engineering, molecular biology, biochemistry, etc.) in a corpus of English texts led us to identify the limits of the principles of the Vienna School (1998 & Temmerman 2000). We particularly attached to the study of categorization (Rosch 1978, Lakoff 1987; Geeraerts 1989) taking into account the approach as well as semasiological onomasiological. We found that in scientific disciplines that deal with life, the aspect of normalization is not essential and that the principles of the Vienna school is not sufficient to establish a realistic terminography of life sciences. This leads to a theory of descriptive terminology based on social cognitive principles. The research methods we have observed in designing specialized texts are inspired by cognitive semantics. By analyzing a corpus of texts in the field of life sciences, there has been the influence of language as a cognitive tool and as sociological data on the ongoing process of understanding. We give below an example of a metaphorical cognitive model that explains the cognitive links between several semantic neologisms (Tournier 1985). Finally, we make some goals for sociocognitiviste terminography.   Key terms: sociocognitivisme; sociocognitiviste terminology  (term-accident-vs-injury)<p /> <p>Language: fr</p>",
language="fr",
issn="1015-5716",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}