@article{ref1, title="Recovered memories of child abuse: fact, fantasy or fancy?", journal="Women and therapy", year="1996", author="Kristiansen, Connie M. and Felton, Kathleen A. and Hovdestad, Wendy E.", volume="19", number="1", pages="47-59", abstract="

In this paper we exemplify the ongoing and inconclusive nature of empirical research examining the validity of adults' recovered memories of childhood abuse. In view of increasing evidence that the processes underlying traumatic memories differ in fundamental ways from those underlying memories for nontraumatic events, experimental studies of everyday memory processes are likely to have little relevance for our understanding of the memory processes underlying traumatic child abuse. Further, given ethical concerns, it is unlikely that research will ever establish a definitive 'scientific' conclusion regarding the accuracy of recovered memories. Nevertheless, both laypersons and professionals are taking a stand on the recovered memory issue. In this regard, we discuss social psychological research that suggests that people's beliefs about recovered memories and other aspects of child abuse are tied to their personal needs and sociopolitical interests rather than to science or social values. These personal needs and interests include people's inability to acknowledge the injustice of child abuse and their opposition to women's equality, both of which vary as a function of people's authoritarian inclinations. The implications of these findings for social action, as opposed to social research, are discussed.

", language="en", issn="0270-3149", doi="10.1300/J015v19n01_05", url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/J015v19n01_05" }