@article{ref1,
title="The Case for Multisystemic Therapy: Evidence or Orthodoxy?",
journal="Children and youth services review",
year="2006",
author="Littell, Julia H.",
volume="28",
number="4",
pages="458-472",
abstract="In this paper, I respond to comments by Henggeler, Schoenwald, Borduin, and Swenson [Henngeler, S. W., Schoenwald, S. K., Borduin, C. M., & Swenson, C. C. (this issue). The Littell paper: Methodological critique and meta-analysis as Trojan horse. Children and Youth Services Review, doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2005.07.001] on my recent article, &quot;Lessons from a systematic review of Multisystemic Therapy&quot;. I identify factual and logical errors in their response, show how relevant research has been misinterpreted and misrepresented, and suggest constructive new directions for Multisystemic Therapy and the evidence-based practice movement. (Abstract Adapted from Source: Children and Youth Services Review, 2006. Copyright © 2006 by Elsevier Science)REFERENCES:Henggeler, S.W., Schoenwald, S.K., Borduin, C.M., & Swenson, C.C. (2006, April). Methodological Critique and Meta-Analysis as Trojan Horse. Children and Youth Services Review, 28(4), 447-457. (VioLit Record Number 20212)Littell, J.H. (2005, April). Lessons from a Systematic Review of Effects of Multisystemic Therapy. Children and Youth Services Review, 27(4), 445-463. (VioLit Record Number 20212)For more information on Multisystemic Therapy, a Blueprints for Violence Prevention Model program, see VioPro record number 2261.Offender TreatmentJuvenile OffenderJuvenile ViolenceJuvenile TreatmentViolence TreatmentFamily BasedCommunity BasedMultisystemic TherapyBlueprints Model ReferenceProgram EffectivenessProgram EvaluationJuvenile BehaviorJuvenile Antisocial BehaviorBehavior TreatmentMeta AnalysisProfessional Criticism02-06<p />",
language="en",
issn="0190-7409",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}