@article{ref1,
title="Sexual predator evaluations and phrenology: considering issues of evidentiary reliability",
journal="Behavioral sciences and the law",
year="2000",
author="Campbell, Terence W.",
volume="18",
number="1",
pages="111-130",
abstract="This article reviews six assessment procedures used for assessing the recidivism risk of previously convicted sexual offenders. The review of these procedures examines whether they comply with generally accepted ethical and practice standards. With few exceptions, most risk assessment instruments fail to comply with these standards. Currently used instruments for risk assessment continue to rely excessively on clinical judgment; and, as a result, they remain at a preliminary stage of development. Consequently, these instruments amount to experimental procedures; and, therefore, they cannot support expert testimony in a legal proceeding. (Abstract Adapted from Source: Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 2000. Copyright © 2000 by John Wiley and Sons)  Offender Assessment Risk Assessment Offender Recidivism Adult Offender Adult Violence Sexual Assault Offender Sexual Assault Assessment Recidivism Assessment 12-02<p />",
language="en",
issn="0735-3936",
doi="10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(200001/02)18:1<5::AID-BSL374>3.0.CO;2-C",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0798(200001/02)18:1<5::AID-BSL374>3.0.CO;2-C"
}