@article{ref1,
title="How accurate are time-use reports? Effects of cognitive enhancement and cultural differences on recall accuracy",
journal="Applied cognitive psychology",
year="1992",
author="Engle, Patrice L. and Lumpkin, J. Bradley",
volume="6",
number="2",
pages="141-159",
abstract="In order to assess the accuracy of time-use reports, 80 young adults were observed for 2-hour periods, and were interviewed about their activities by a different person the following day. Two experiments were performed. In the first, three different levels of cognitive enhancement were used to improve recall accuracy. Subjects were 60 California college students, 20 per group. In the second study the maximum enhancement condition was replicated with 20 Guatemalan subjects, similar in age, sex and level of education to the California subjects. Both the accuracy of their recall of specific activities, and the accuracy of their time-duration estimates were calculated. Results indicated that the enhancement conditions in Study 1 significantly increased both the number of activities recalled accurately (from 40 to 63 per cent) and the amount of time accurately recalled (from 58 to 70 per cent). In Study 2 the Guatemalans recalled 60 per cent of their activities accurately, and recalled as much time accurately as the Californians. The Guatemalans were significantly more likely to underestimate their time. In other words, when they made errors, these were almost always underestimations. Most of the recall error could be accounted for by forgetting an activity altogether, rather than by estimating its time inaccurately.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0888-4080",
doi="10.1002/acp.2350060205",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060205"
}