@article{ref1,
title="Assessing Danger: What Judges Need To Know",
journal="Family court review",
year="2012",
author="Nichols-Hadeed, Corey A. and Cerulli, Catherine and Kaukeinen, Kimberly and Rhodes, Karin V. and Campbell, Jacquelyn C.",
volume="50",
number="1",
pages="150-158",
abstract="Every day, judges are faced with decisions regarding intimate partner violence (IPV) victims' requests for protection orders, custody arrangements, and visitation schedules. To make informed decisions, judges must understand victims' risk for future violence. This mixed method study explores the extent to which protection order petitions (n=169) communicate victims' current danger and future risk of violence. Methods included interviews coupled with an archival review of court petitions. Findings suggest judges are inadequately prepared to render decisions to improve victim safety in the absence of standardized risk assessments. The Danger Assessment provides an evidence-based solution to routinize intake interviews with victims petitioning the court.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1531-2445",
doi="10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01436.x",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-1617.2011.01436.x"
}