@article{ref1,
title="Cost-effectiveness strategies to treat osteoporosis in elderly women",
journal="Southern medical journal",
year="2006",
author="Pfister, Alfred K. and Welch, Christine A. and Lester, Melissa D. and Emmett, Mary K. and Saville, Paul D. and Duerring, Shea A.",
volume="99",
number="2",
pages="123-131",
abstract="BACKGROUND: Comparing the cost-effectiveness of various antiosteoporotic drugs has not been defined. METHODS: We determined the cost-effectiveness of calcitonin, raloxifene, bisphosphates and PTH in a base-case cohort of women aged 65 or older with osteoporosis. After bone densitometry, women were stratified into groups of treatment or no treatment. Our outcome goal was a value of dollars 100,000 or less per quality-adjusted life years (QALY). A sensitivity analysis varied nonvertebral fracture reduction and compliance between the two most effective strategies to test various cost per QALY thresholds. RESULTS: Bisphosphonates displayed the most favorable incremental cost saving and prevented more fractures in our base-case analysis. In a sensitivity analysis, virtually all values of bisphosphonates were under dollars 100,000 per QALY and parathyroid hormone (PTH) was between dollars 100,000 and dollars 200,000 per QALY. CONCLUSIONS: Only bisphosphonates are cost-effective for fracture prevention in osteoporotic women aged 65 or older and this economic advantage is also maintained in subsets who have a lower relative risk of future fracture.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0038-4348",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}