@article{ref1,
title="Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference",
journal="Journal of experimental psychology: human perception and performance",
year="2012",
author="Bissett, Patrick G. and Logan, Gordon D. and Yamaguchi, Motonori",
volume="38",
number="1",
pages="123-134",
abstract="Although dual-task interference is ubiquitous in a variety of task domains, stop-signal studies suggest that response inhibition is not subject to such interference. Nevertheless, no study has directly examined stop-signal performance in a dual-task setting. In two experiments, stop-signal performance was examined in a psychological refractory period task, in which subjects inhibited one response while still executing the other. The results showed little evidence for the refractory effect in stop-signal reaction time, and stop-signal reaction time was similar in dual-task and single-task conditions, despite the fact that overt reaction times were significantly affected by dual-task interference. Therefore, the present study supports the claim that response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2011 APA, all rights reserved).<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0096-1523",
doi="10.1037/a0023918",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0023918"
}