@article{ref1,
title="Reading Habermas in Iran: political tolerance and the prospect of non-violent movement in Iran",
journal="Journal of global ethics",
year="2010",
author="Payrow Shabani, Omid",
volume="6",
number="2",
pages="141-141",
abstract="In this paper, I intend to appropriate the explanatory power of some of Habermas' recent ideas (such as complementary learning processes, modernization of faith, tolerance, and non-violence) for the purpose of examining the current political situation in Iran. I would like to argue that the recent history of Iran has offered an occasion for a development away from a dogmatic religious consciousness and toward a more tolerant one. I submit that these opposing modes of thought are, respectively, represented by the hardliners in power and the reformists in opposition. The current impasse, I argue, is the result of an asymmetrical learning process, where the conservative camp has not evolved along with the reformers. I submit that the way out of the impasse is a fully fledged non-violent movement of civil disobedience by the opposition. The politics of non-violence engagement can be realized by fostering a culture of tolerance as the acceptance of reasonable disagreements and the rejection of violent means in politics. I argue that such a movement has begun to emerge after the June 12 2009 presidential election in the form of the Green Hope Movement.<p />",
language="",
issn="1744-9626",
doi="10.1080/17449626.2010.494361",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2010.494361"
}