@article{ref1,
title="The clinical-forensic dichotomy in sexual abuse evaluations: moving toward an integrative model",
journal="Journal of child sexual abuse",
year="2010",
author="Tishelman, Amy C. and Meyer, Susanne K. and Haney, Penny and McLeod, Sara K.",
volume="19",
number="5",
pages="590-608",
abstract="We propose the use of an approach to evaluation that can be undertaken in a clinical setting when concerns regarding child sexual abuse are unclear or ambiguous and other systems are not involved, thus providing an option for the nondisclosing child often discussed in the &quot;delayed disclosure&quot; literature. This approach can also be appropriate for a child with a questionable prior disclosure not being served by other intervention systems. We have labeled this an &quot;integrative&quot; model, incorporating forensically sound practices into evaluations conducted in a clinical setting. The goals of this manuscript are to (a) provide a rationale for conducting child sexual abuse extended evaluations in a clinical setting, (b) delineate the purposes of such evaluations, (c) differentiate this &quot;integrative&quot; model from the forensic-clinical dichotomy framework discussed by Kuehnle (1996), and (d) briefly describe the format, which can be refined by future practice and research.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1053-8712",
doi="10.1080/10538712.2010.512553",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10538712.2010.512553"
}