@article{ref1,
title="WHOSE RIGHTS, AND WHAT's THE DIFFERENCE? A CRITIQUE OF BETH SINGER'S “HUMAN RIGHTS: SOME CURRENT ISSUES”",
journal="Metaphilosophy",
year="2007",
author="Gayman, Cynthia",
volume="38",
number="4",
pages="431-439",
abstract="Abstract:  In this article I argue against the rights-based framework defining the abortion debate, and do so by considering the views of Beth Singer, a philosopher whose work conveys a broadly pragmatist formulation of traditional rights-based language. Although Singer's schema presents a fruitful vantage point from which to consider the abortion question through the discourse of rights, even Singer's use of the language of rights ultimately fails adequately to address the subject. I challenge Singer's view by taking up John Dewey's concept of reflective morality, elucidated in his 1932 Ethics.<p />",
language="",
issn="0026-1068",
doi="10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00492.x",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9973.2007.00492.x"
}