@article{ref1,
title="The Nature‐Nurture Debate Is Over, and Both Sides Lost! Implications for Understanding Gender Differences in Religiosity",
journal="Journal for the scientific study of religion",
year="2009",
author="Bradshaw, Matt and Ellison, Christopher G.",
volume="48",
number="2",
pages="241-251",
abstract="In the debate about biological dispositions or differential sex-role socialization, too much emphasis is given to an either- or dichotomy. We argue that the higher religiosity of women is likely the product of both biological and environmental influences by discussing: (1) the fallacy of nature “versus” nurture; (2) biological influences on religious outcomes; (3) biological influences on the predictors of religious involvement; (4) causality and confounding in social science; and (5) interdisciplinary models of biology-environment interplay.<p />",
language="",
issn="0021-8294",
doi="10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01443.x",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5906.2009.01443.x"
}