@article{ref1,
title="Raising doubts about claims of malingering: implications of relationships between MCMI-II and MMPI-2 performances",
journal="Journal of clinical psychology (Hoboken)",
year="1994",
author="Grillo, J. and Brown, R. S. and Hilsabeck, R. and Price, J. R. and Lees-Haley, Paul R.",
volume="50",
number="4",
pages="651-655",
abstract="Test results from 90 personal injury claimants were used to explore the relationship between personality disorders (Dependent, Histrionic, Compulsive, Schizoid, Schizotypal, Paranoid, Narcissistic, Borderline, Antisocial, Avoidant, and Passive-Aggressive) as assessed by the MCMI-II and response style measured by MMPI-2 validity scales (F, K, L, F-K, O-S, Es, and FBS). With the exception of the Dependent and Narcissistic scales, all personality disorder scales were found to have a significant relationship with validity indicators in the direction of faking bad. These results suggest that the presence of characterological factors (i.e., a personality disorder), rather than malingering, contributes to exaggerated results in a forensic setting. Implications for future research are addressed.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0021-9762",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}