@article{ref1,
title="An approach to evaluating competence in assessing and managing violence risk",
journal="Psychiatric services",
year="2011",
author="McNiel, Dale E. and Hung, Erick K. and Cramer, Robert J. and Hall, Stephen E. and Binder, Renée L.",
volume="62",
number="1",
pages="90-92",
abstract="Objective: The authors developed and evaluated a tool for assessing competency in violence risk assessment and management. Methods: The Competency Assessment Instrument for Violence Risk (CAI-V) was based on the literature on violence risk assessment, which was complemented by feedback from faculty focus groups. In an objective structured clinical examination, 31 faculty observers used the CAI-V to rate the performance of 31 learners' (26 psychiatry residents and five psychology interns) risk assessments of standardized (simulated) patients. In an interrater reliability study, six faculty members rated video-recorded risk assessments. Results: The CAI-V had good internal consistency reliability (α=.93). Senior learners performed better on the CAI-V than junior learners, supporting the instrument's concurrent validity. Interrater reliability was good (intraclass correlation coefficient=.93). Participants reported that the CAI-V provided a helpful structure for feedback and supervision. Conclusions: The results supported the potential of this new approach for appraising competency in violence risk assessment and management. (Psychiatric Services 62:90-92, 2011).<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="1075-2730",
doi="10.1176/appi.ps.62.1.90",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.62.1.90"
}