@article{ref1,
title="Evaluation of the necessity of clinical observation of high-energy trauma patients without significant injury after standardized emergency room stabilization",
journal="Journal of trauma",
year="2004",
author="Lansink, Koen W. W. and Cornejo, Carol J. and Boeije, Tom and Kok, Maarten F. and Jurkovich, Gregory J. and Ponsen, Kees J.",
volume="57",
number="6",
pages="1256-1259",
abstract="BACKGROUND: Patients involved in a high-energy trauma (HET) are usually admitted for clinical observation, even when no significant injury is found after standard care in the emergency room (ER). The necessity of this observation period is not evidence based. The goal of this study was to identify patients who revealed an initially undiagnosed injury during the observation period. METHODS: A retrospective study of consecutive HET patients was conducted in two Level I trauma centers. Patients after a HET with two minor injuries or less, diagnosed during the standard ER care, were included. Data were abstracted from patients' medical records. RESULTS: Five hundred three patients were included. None of the patients developed any complications during the clinical observation period or were readmitted to their own hospital within a week after the trauma. CONCLUSION: There is no evidence for the necessity of clinical observation of HET patients with minimal or no injuries diagnosed after standard ER stabilization and evaluation.<p /><p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0022-5282",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}