@article{ref1,
title="Standing armies and armed citizens: An historical analysis of the Second Amendment",
journal="Journal on firearms and public policy",
year="1988",
author="Weatherup, RG",
volume="1",
number="1",
pages="63-123",
abstract="There has been very little case law construing the Second Amendment, perhaps because there has been very little federal legislation on the subject of firearms.  This may change, and it may become necessary for the Supreme Court to rule upon constitutional challenges to federal statutes based on the Second Amendment.  Even before this occurs, it would be helpful to dispel the uncertainties that exist in Congress about the extent of federal legislative power.  In order to determine accurately the intended meaning of the Second Amendment, it is necessary to delve into history.   It is necessary to consider the very nature of a constitutional guarantee -- whether it is an inherent, fundamental right, derived from abstract human nature and natural law or, alternatively, a restriction on governmental power imposed after experience with abuse of power.  Historically, the right to keep and bear arms has been closely intertwined with questions of political sovereignty, the right of revolution, civil and military power, military organization, crime and personal security.  The Second Amendment was written neither by accident nor without purpose; it was the product of centuries of Anglo-American legal and political experience.  This development will be examined in order to determine whether the &quot;collectivist&quot; or &quot;individualist&quot; construction of the Second Amendment is correct.<p />",
language="",
issn="1930-7616",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}