@article{ref1,
title="To keep and bear their private arms: The adoption of the Second Amendment 1787-1791",
journal="Journal on firearms and public policy",
year="1989",
author="Halbrook, Stephen P.",
volume="2",
number="1",
pages="101-134",
abstract="After the Constitution was submitted for ratification in 1787, political writings and debates in state conventions revealed two basic positions: the federalist view that a bill of rights was unnecessary because the proposed government had no positive grant of power to deprive individuals of rights, and the anti-federalist contention that a formal declaration would enhance protection of those rights. On the subject of arms, the federalists promised that the people, far from ever being disarmed, would be sufficiently armed to check an oppressive standing army. The anti-federalists feared that the body or the people as militia would be overpowered by a select militia of standing army unless there was a specific recognition of the individual right to keep and bear arms.<p />",
language="",
issn="1930-7616",
doi="",
url="http://dx.doi.org/"
}