@article{ref1,
title="Aligning confidence with accuracy: revisiting the role of feedback",
journal="Acta psychologica",
year="2007",
author="González-Vallejo, C. and Bonham, Aaron",
volume="125",
number="2",
pages="221-239",
abstract="Evaluation point feedback was used to align confidence judgments with accurate/inaccurate responding to general knowledge questions. Rehearsal of item-answer pairs and three evaluation systems based on a scoring rule had different effects on confidence, accuracy and their relationship. Using standard calibration measures (Yates, J.F., (1990). Judgment and Decision Making. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall) we found that a point system comprising of both rewarding (positive) and punishing (negative) consequences produced the best performance across levels of knowledge in comparison to all-rewarding and all-penalty rules.<p /> <p>Language: en</p>",
language="en",
issn="0001-6918",
doi="10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.010",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2006.07.010"
}