@article{ref1,
title="We and Us: Two Modes of Group Identification",
journal="Journal of peace research",
year="1995",
author="Eriksen, Thomas hylland",
volume="32",
number="4",
pages="427-436",
abstract="This essentially theoretical essay is intended as a contribution to the ongoing discussion on the relationship between social identification and enemy images. Empirical material from Mauritius is used to illuminate various dimensions of identification, and a number of general points are made: First, identification shifts circumstantially and is contingent on symbolic legitimation as well as personal experiences. Second, and perhaps less evidently, the composition of groups shifts accordingly - both as relevant system boundaries change and as perceived social contrasts change. Third, identification is contingent on two basic mechanisms: we-hood or internal principles for cohesion, and us-hood or contrasting with others. Fourth, the encouragement of multiple loyalties may reduce conflict potential.<p />",
language="",
issn="0022-3433",
doi="10.1177/0022343395032004004",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0022343395032004004"
}