@article{ref1,
title="Political Conclusions of the Study 'The Consequences of War and the Prevention of War'",
journal="Journal of peace research",
year="1973",
author="Afheldt, H.",
volume="10",
number="3",
pages="259-263",
abstract="Seven theses and two consequences constitute the summary of the study: Thesis 1: The Federal Republic of Germany can not be defended by means of conven tional weapons. Thesis 2: The use of nuclear weapons in defence of West Germany would lead to nuclear self-destruction. Thesis 3: For the Federal Republic of Germany there only exists a self-contradictory pol icy of deterrence (deterrence by means of incalculable risks for both sides). Thesis 4: Between the superpowers there exists a strategy of deterrence which in its mili tary logic is not self-contradictory. Thesis 5: Deterrence policy as pursued by the superpowers (however) results in an arms race. Thesis 6: The arms race increases the risk of war. Thesis 7: The attempt to maintain an equilibrium of deterrence through the arms race cripples the superpowers politically and militarily. Consequences: 1. Precisely because it is highly questionable, the deterrence system opens up a margin of man oeuvre for the Federal Republic of Germany to utilize armaments decisions as a means for foreign policy. 2. In the appraisal of any policy, top priority must be given to contributions to the creation of a politically guaranteed world peace.<p />",
language="",
issn="0022-3433",
doi="10.1177/002234337301000310",
url="http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002234337301000310"
}